This line of idiotic propaganda by IPOB and its demented sympathizers, using AI-Generated audiovisuals only diminishes the Igbo worldwide and adds absolutely nothing to the proceedings before the Court.

Nnamdi Kanu’s attempt to buy time and trigger confusion by calling 23 Witnesses who are totally irrelevant to the charges against him; at a time the Court has given specific dates to present his defence has already been shut down by the Court which cautioned him to use what is left of the 6-day time window stipulated by the Court, to present his defense.

For the enlightenment of those who wish to learn, it is the Court, in its discretion, that can summon witnesses by way of Subpoenas on behalf of any Party that so requests. However, to invoke the power of subpoenas, the Court must be satisfied that such witnesses are NECESSARY to establish the case of the party requesting the subpoena.

It is also on account of being a NECESSARY Witness that the person to be so subpoenaed can be COMPELLABLE.

Unfortunately for the accused person here, Nnamdi Kanu, the charges before the court against him relate only to WHETHER OR NOT he made the inciting statements prohibited by the Terror Prevention and Prohibition Act of 2022 (TPPA-2022), as presented by the Prosecution by way of audiovisual evidence. Nothing else other than establishing that the voice on the audiovisuals belong to Nnamdi Kanu, is required by the Prosecution to prove their case and secure conviction.

None of the 23 so-called witnesses listed by Nnamdi Kanu are required to establish whether or not the voice on the various audiovisuals presented by the Prosecution belongs to Nnamdi Kanu.

This means that none of them is a necessary Witness and so none is a compellable witness that can be subpoenaed by the Court to testify at the request of the accused.

The Court already dismissed the ignorant request of the accused, reminding him in the proceedings that the 6-day window stipulated by the Court for him to present his defense will not be extended.

When the Trial comes to a conclusion and a verdict is pronounced, it will be self-evident that a dishonest, ignorant, and arrogant accused person was aided by his greedy, dishonest and mediocre lawyers to plunge himself into the outcome represented by the Verdict.